Share this post via E-mail
[Email]
Share
June 26, 2008

Leading Catholic Columnist Responds to Kmiec’s Delusional Assertion that Obama is Pro-life

Last week we wrote about Catholic professor Doug Kmiec’s delusional assertion that Barack Obama is pro-life. And, of course, we said “hogwash” in response to Kmiec’s ridiculous distortion of Obama’s position on abortion.

We weren’t the only ones that were appalled by what Kmiec had to say. Leading Catholic columnist Deal Hudson has just written a national editorial saying that pro-life Catholics should reject Obama because of his radical pro-abortion positions. He says that Kmiec and others are confusing Catholic voters. And Hudson is right. Obama has a 0% right-to-life voting record and consistently opposes policies to restrict or end abortion and that’s the truth!

Hudson said Kmiec and other Catholic backers will try to gloss over Obama’s pro-abortion views by saying McCain is too wrong on other political issues the Catholic Church doesn’t consider as important as protecting unborn children.

Hudson said, “Their strategy is obvious: Obama’s Catholics will do everything they can to avoid the infanticide question.”

What exactly is the “infanticide question” Hudson is referring to? When Obama served in the Illinois Senate, he twice voted against legislation to provide appropriate medical care to late-term babies who had survived abortion attempts. And on a third occasion, Obama used the power of his committee chairmanship to prevent the legislation from reaching the Senate floor for a vote. The issue was not abortion — it was infanticide — of born living, breathing babies.

For Hudson, the final straw was Obama’s promise to Planned Parenthood that he would sign the Freedom of Choice Act into law during his first week in office. This legislation would make legalized abortion a national law but it would also undo all state and federal laws that restrict abortion — laws that protect taxpayers from paying for women’s abortion, laws requiring parental consent prior to a minor’s abortion and many others.

Hudson says it’s “difficult for Catholic supporters of Obama to keep a straight face when talking about a culture of life” and he urges Catholics to reject their disingenuous rhetoric. Obama, he says, is so out of line with Catholic teaching on abortion that he can’t be supported for president.

Good for Deal Hudson!

Sue

Posted by mark under Uncategorized |

1 Comment »

  1. Thanks so much to you and Deal Hudson for bringing up the “infanticide question.” The Illinois bills was SB 1661. I bring this up all the time in conversations about Obama. You would be surprised how many have never heard of it. There is no argument here. This is life! To assist in snuffing it out whether you are religious or not is so wrong. These votes by Obama for SB 1661 speak volumes about his character….if indeed, there is any!! Whenever I see Obama’s current commercial about his upbringing and family values, I nearly puke because I think of SB 1661 and what it represents. The media and for that matter the Republican Party aren’t talking about this. I don’t know if the Republicans are waiting until closer to election day to bring this up or what but it drives me crazy. This I would think should be a huge issue. The televison spots that could be run about this could do huge damage to Obama’s image. Remember the knock on Obama voting present so much in the Illinois Legislature, well he certainly did not vote present when it came to denying life to born alive infants. Apparently he felt comfortable with his vote. He did it twice.

    Comment by DR Rogers — June 26, 2008 @ 9:37 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. | TrackBack URI

XHTML ( You can use these tags): <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong> .